|
Post by narutoninja44 on Jun 16, 2008 1:26:35 GMT 12
^Exactaly. We need Naruchu's in the world. ;D It's called an action replay, James.
|
|
|
Post by advanceshipper3 on Jan 5, 2009 7:43:07 GMT 12
I can picture something now.
Everybody except for Ash: Pikachu's evolving! *Gasp* What will we do?
Ash: I've got an idea! *Throws the Everstone at Pikachu*
Brock: Pikachu stopped evolveing!
*Pikachu's glow has faded and it now has black swirlies in it's eyes from being hit by an everstone*
;D
And Pikachu will never ever evolve. Trust me on this. Ash asked Pikachu if it wanted to evolve it said no twice. So I don't think so. I mean Pikachu could've evolved in that episode Pika and Goliath! But he didn't.
|
|
|
Post by Elite4James on Jan 5, 2009 12:54:07 GMT 12
Ash never ages, therefore Pikachu never evolves.
|
|
|
Post by crazy azn7200 on Jan 5, 2009 14:29:03 GMT 12
^yea James is right
|
|
|
Post by Midnightmoon602 on Jan 7, 2009 15:24:28 GMT 12
I'm sure the pokemon won't evolve their main mascot from pokemon. and i think nobody wants a big fat Raichu on Ash's shoulder.
|
|
|
Post by thedarkfiddler on Jan 8, 2009 1:43:10 GMT 12
Never. Once you evolve, you never go back. Ever. Not true, Slowbro/King can devolve, according to the Pokedex!
|
|
|
Post by crazy azn7200 on Jan 8, 2009 11:29:32 GMT 12
^^yeah I would think that if pikachu evolved the ratings might go down
|
|
|
Post by Midnightmoon602 on Jan 8, 2009 18:16:30 GMT 12
Pikachu was the thing that made me go into pokemon in the first place. and come on. Pikachu is their mascot. they would have to be stuiped to evolve it.
And the ratings won't just go down. they will go down the floor. i mean imagine the ratings for the english version of pokemon. i mean nearly everybody hate the new voices.
|
|
|
Post by Praetor on Jan 8, 2009 23:51:02 GMT 12
Pokemon is full of conservatives (in terms of voicing)...
And yes, Pikachu is a major mascot of Pokemon; not really Raichu.
|
|
|
Post by Elite4James on Jan 9, 2009 2:09:13 GMT 12
Never. Once you evolve, you never go back. Ever. Not true, Slowbro/King can devolve, according to the Pokedex! Good point, however: Game ≠ Anime
|
|
|
Post by advanceshipper3 on Jan 9, 2009 12:43:03 GMT 12
I agree with Praetor Pokemon has bad voiceing the BF voices sucked. Veronica Taylor is a much better Ash voice person then the current one. They should've brought May's old voice back when she came back in the Sinnoh Saga.
I think Ash would be a mess if Pikachu evolved. Think about A Raichu on Ash's shoulder that's just messed up. I would probably still watch Pokemon even if Pikachu did evolve. But seeing as that will never happen.
Meh. I just want to see May again. I'm not really a big fan of Dawn or Misty. I don't know why I just don't.
Pikachu just won't evolve. He just won't. Never in your life. Never. And plus Team Rocket stole the thunder stone in Pika and Goliath! They sold it.
Anyway onto my statement. Pikachu will never evolve in your dreams. Just like we can all dream that the producers will put May in another version of the series. It stars only May and her journey to Johto but that will never ever ever happen.
Yeah I've said enough. Pikachu won't evolve.
|
|
|
Post by Midnightmoon602 on Jan 13, 2009 21:44:00 GMT 12
I just want to add that IF they did evolve Pikachu people wouldn't fall in love with it. even mercerdice like this wouldn't be in stock. www.projecthitchhiker.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/pokemon-cosplay.jpgYes. it was the only good picture i could find. anyway know imagine if they did evolve pikachu. nearly every pokemon merchendice if Pikachu. so making it evoove will collaspe the whole show together.
|
|
|
Post by razgriz89 on Feb 13, 2009 1:16:09 GMT 12
Ash never ages, therefore Pikachu never evolves. Sorry but I'll have to disagree. We may not notice it but all Pokemon characters are aging; only slowly. Unless a TV series is of a sci-fi genre, all characters are subject to aging no matter what. It's the natural law. Otherwise, people will start criticizing the series about immortality of the characters which is a violation of some doctrines in some religions. As for Pikachu, of course you need a Thunder Stone for it to evolve. So it is proven here that aging is different from evolution.
|
|
MagmarFire
Brilliant member
Always thinking of you...
Posts: 648
|
Post by MagmarFire on Feb 13, 2009 10:42:32 GMT 12
The Pokemon universe supposedly goes by a floating timeline. By definition, this means the characters do not age. (I also don't see how a sci-fi TV show should be exempt from natural law and others shouldn't, but that's beside the point, I guess.)
However, I, too, choose to disagree with this, since it leads to a buttload of continuity issues down the road--whether they're relevant or irrelevant is irrelevant. They're still there, and before long, they build up to the point where it becomes very fishy.
|
|
|
Post by razgriz89 on Feb 13, 2009 10:58:37 GMT 12
But if you'll look closely, there are some changes in the animation that could also signify signs of aging.
|
|